The Beauty of Soviet Lens

 So, what happens when you compare a modern zoom lens to a Cold-War-Era prime lens.  Yeah, I was curious, too.  So I did it.  Below are frame grabs from 4 different scenarios shot during the same test.  No post production was done to keep the results as clinical as possible.

The Test

In this test, we put a Sigma 24-27 f/2.8 against a Helios 44-2 on an FX9 camera.  Not something that you'd ever think to use together.  But a great comparison to realize just how far apart these lenses are.  Check out the results below.  Be sure to comment your thoughts on the test and the analysis!

Shot #1

This is the basic set-up for the test.  We used all tungsten lighting throughout to keep the color temperature consistent. Additionally, the exposure was changed through camera settings, not light dimming.  This allowed for more consistency throughout the project.  

Helios

Zoom


Shot #2

For this shot we put a light directly behind the model.  Here we were looking for the halation through her hair.  The Helios gave a gently bloom , while the Sigma was very clinical.

Helios

Zoom

Shot #3

In this version, we simply asked the model to reveal the light behind her, sending that light straight into the lens.

Helios

Zoom

Shot #4

The most defining shot of the series was the side flare.  This shot showcases the vast difference between the two lenses.  While the Helios offers the most beautiful flares, the Sigma really shows how it is a great modern lens for clean run-n-gun productions, utilizing the highly advanced auto-focus system of the the Sony FX9.

Helio


Zoom



 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What happens when you only shoot with available light?

Making the Shot

How to Use Video Effectively in Your Inbound Marketing Strategy